Hello,
My name is Selwyn Lee, a graduating Mass
Communications student at Ngee Ann Polytechnic.
I am the original author of the letter,
which i wish to mention was extensively edited by the NP Tribune editor
Jeremy Boo.
I wrote the letter on behalf of my
girlfriend Petrina Anthony, keeping with the infomation that was provided
to me as I am a PR student and would be best suited to delivering such a
response. Curiously enough, I am also have some sympathy towards beliefs
in LaVeyan Satanism. A nicely mixed cocktail indeed.
As for the letter published in the
Tribune, The editor requested that we formulate the reply which had
certain requirements to which we adhered to. Amongst others, he asked that
we include the difference between evangelism and attempted conversion.
Furthermore he requested that we only include the CYA's stand on matters
and not to comment on the issue at large. Hence neither me nor Petrina is
responsible for the style used. At the end I have enclosed a copy of my
original letter, written with Jeremy's requests in mind.
Also, I find it prudent to state that all
I wrote in the letter to the Tribune was factual. The Catholic Youth
Apostolate has not, nor does it plan to, had any activities targeted at
non catholics. the organisation is practically self-serving, and they have
a grand total of less than 15 members. I for one have attended, finding it
an excellent venue to play Diablo while waiting for my girlfriend.
I feel that the manner you edited the
letter was irresponsible and self-serving. I agree with the rest of your
article, but the usage of my letter was irresponsible. It took my words
out of context. Therefore , I respectfully request that statements made
pertaining to the article be retracted, or a clarification made with
regard to the original unedited letter.
|
| The letter from the Catholic
Youth Apostolate as edited and published by NPTribune (Jan- Mar
2009)
'Religion is a personal choice'
I refer to Vinoth Kumar's letter,
"No proselytisation on campus please"
While I do not speak for other
religious organisations in the polytechnic, I wish to clarify
that the Catholic Youth Apostolate (CYA) is a club for
fellowship for Catholic students.
Our main function is not to
proselytise but to minister to the needs of our members. Most of
our activities are social activities organised for our members.
Our sole attempt to recruit members among Catholic youths during
my tenure as chairman was at the previous CCA fiesta.
The Roman Catholic Church
officially believes in evangelism: "Spreading
knowledge". That is in contrast to the popular
misconception that evangelism means conversion and
proselytisation.
There is a difference between
spreading knowledge and trying to convert people. The CYA's
stand is that religion is a personal choice. We are against the
idea of coercing people into conversion. We can talk to people
as much as they allow us, but it is strictly against our policy
to force people into religion.
Catholicism definitely does not
believe in undermining religious harmony. Catholic priests, for
example, are required to study other faiths as well as their
own. This helps prevent a culture of misunderstanding of other
religions.
Petrina Anita Anthony
Chairman
Catholic Youth Apostolate
|
|
This body of text was what was submitted
to Jeremy, before it was edited
Catholicism definitely does not believe
in undermining religious harmony. Catholic priests, for example, are
required to study other faiths as well as their own. This helps to
prevent a culture of misunderstanding and unhealthy suspicion of other
religions.
Officially, the Catholic Church does
believe in evangelism. That would be, of course, going by the dictionary
definition of ‘spreading knowledge’. That is in contrast to the
popular misconception that evangelism equates to conversion, much like
anarchy is popularly misconstrued as synonymous to chaos. To break it
down further, the Catholic Church believes in telling people about the
gospel instead of merely bloating our numbers.
There is indeed a fine line between
spreading knowledge and trying to convert people. To go a step further,
there is an additional line between merely talking to people and putting
them under duress. Our official stand is that religion is a personal
choice and that we are against the idea of coercing people into
conversion. We can talk to people as much as they allow us, but it is
strictly against our policy (both us and the catholic church’s) to
force people into religion with either duress or coercive means. If
people convert to Catholicism, it is of their own free will.
On a secondary note, CYA’s primary
function is to be a club for fellowship for catholic students in Ngee
Ann. Our main function is definitely not to convert people, but rather
to minister to needs of our members. We have not, in recent memory, had
any outreach activities to the public at large. As such, most of our
activities are targeted at our members, for fellowship. Our sole attempt
to recruit members during my tenure as chairman was at the previous CCA
fiesta.
Finally, on a more personal note, I am
proud to say I am a libertarian at heart. I believe that everybody
should be given the right to do what he or she wants, so long as it does
not harm people who do not wish to be harmed. To tie that into this
matter at hand, I wish to quote Voltaire.
I may not agree with what you have to
say, but I shall defend until the death your right to say it.
I fear that the viewpoints posited in
this letter, including the choice of language as well as those pondering
‘the need for such organisations in our Polytechnic." are nothing
short of those that might draw us closer to becoming an Orwellian state.
You may not agree with our doings, but it would be nothing short of
fascist to question our right to exist.
Another point to note, you seem to
believe all people worship in temples, mosques and churches. Apparently
there are no jews, Sikhs, neo-pagans, Satanists, shintoists,
zoroastrianists, wiccans or those of the baha’i faith in Singapore.
How ignorant.
Oh and a final point to ponder. Why
didn’t you just tell them sternly to go away?
And thus would be the original letter.
|
| Foreword by Yawning Bread
Selwyn Lee sent Yawning Bread
this email letter in response to the article Preachers, pests and usurpers.
I reproduce it here unedited, in its entirety.
He describes my original edit as
"irresponsible and self-serving".
* * *
On a tangential note, I think it
is important to bear in mind that the original letter to NPTribune,
by Vinoth Kumar R, did not say that the 2 persons who annoyed
him were Catholic. In fact, if we are familiar with Christian
proselytisation in Singapore, in all likelihood, they were not;
more likely a protestant group.
However, as readers might have
noted from Preachers, pests and usurpers,
when the editor of NPTribune asked various Christian groups on
the Ngee Ann Polytechnic campus to respond, none did except the
Catholic Youth Apostolate (CYA).
* * *
Coming back to the question of
"irresponsible and self-serving", in the original
version of the letter sent to NPTribune, which you can see here
in Selwyn Lee's letter, there is the sentence "Officially,
the Catholic Church does believe in evangelism. That would be,
of course, going by the dictionary definition of ‘spreading
knowledge’."
NPTribune edited that before
publication. What I could see was the version as published,
reproduced in the
salmon-coloured box.
In a nutshell, the edited, published
letter took this form:
- Officially we believe in
evangelism, but in practice, the CYA has not been doing
it.
- In any case, evangelism is
"spreading knowledge", not conversion/proselytisation.
- We don't coerce.
- We are all for religious
harmony
Which of the four points above is
the most striking and newsworthy? Which are banal? In my view,
it was the second that stood out, and thus it was the second
that I highlighted.
|
|
|
As for my viewpoint on the issue,
Yes, I disagree with such Christian
efforts to force religion on others. From a personal perspective, I find
religion much like a set of iron fetters for the mind. I don’t believe
in organized religion.
Admittedly, I am a theist. Many of your
readers seem not to be able to understand the difference between
agnosticism and atheism. Atheism is the non-belief in a god, or any god(s)
for that matter. Agnosticism is a lack of belief in whether the character
or existence of a god(s) can be proved. I believe that there is some
cosmic power at work which made the world. However I don’t know who,
what or where it is and consequently do not subscribe to the madcap
ramblings of people claiming they do.
However, I do believe in freedom of
religion. One important thing I have learnt from LaVeyan Satanism would be
belief in freedom. Freedom to do whatever you want, so long as it does not
harm people who do not wish to be harmed. People should be allowed to
carry out their religion, so long as it does not adversely affect others.
In this manner I disagree with the current state of Christianity in
Singapore. Some christians nowadays believe that they have the right to
tout their religion freely. They also act like Christianity is ineffable
which I believe to be utter nonsense. The various churchs have never
claimed to be the voices of conscience for Singaporeans and It would
certainly be a mistake for any of their members to coherce others into
thinking in that fashion. Singapore is not, and hopefully will never be, a
Christian country. Singapore is a multi religious country and we do not
have room for zealots here.
thanks for reading this. i hope to
hear a reply soon.
|
| Actually I would also take issue
with the letter's claim that the Catholic Church does not coerce.
Baptising children when they are too young to understand, and
then programming their minds with all sorts of religious stuff,
and making them feel that it would be a grave betrayal to
renounce Catholicism even when they are adults, is coercion.
In other articles (including an
upcoming one) in Yawning Bread, I write about people who exploit
children sexually and how they are punished by law.
What is the moral difference
between one and the other?
|
|