| Yawning
Bread. August 2007
Lee Low Tar by Ng Yi-Sheng
|
|
|
|
A fictional, metatextual farce by Ng Yi-Sheng Composed Tuesday 24 July, 2007. * * * * * Denial of licence communicated Tuesday 31 July 2007.
Dear Sir/Madam, Re: Application for Arts Entertainment Licence Thank you for your application dated 25/07/2007 to hold a public reading of literary work. As you must know, the Media Authority on Development (MAD) is extremely supportive of the development and dissemination of Singapore writing. We welcome such events as yours as a vital element in the growth of our national culture. This being said, however, we regret to inform you that one story – and one story alone - in your programme lineup, has not met with our board's approval. Even by our liberal standards, we have been forced to rule that Ng Yi-Sheng's "Lee Low Tar" is not a work of literature, but a specimen of the most degraded pornography known to man. Indeed, the author admits as much when he introduces the text in his preface as "an account of the perverse and prurient adventures of the dangerously beautiful and seductive schoolboy Vladimir Koh Nah Bay". His unusual protagonist, an avowed nymphomaniac by the age of eighteen, is to spend the greater part of the ensuing pages engaging in a number of highly imaginative sex acts with men; a premise which our board of reviewers, in the light of Section 377A of the Penal Code, cannot condone. This fact in itself would be sufficient grounds to disqualify the tale for licensing. Yet the author further complicates matters by making Vladimir Koh one of a peculiar and unique variety of perverts; namely, the gerontophile, one who derives erotic pleasure through contact with old men. And I quote:
We believe that Vladimir Koh represents an inaccurate reflection of the homosexual community, which is commonly known for its adoration of young, muscular men. Such a contrary character will only frustrate expectations and stimulate widespread depression in the community. We further believe that he sets an extremely poor example for the youth of our country to follow. Consider, for example, the episode wherein Vladimir discovers his proclivity towards the aged, during a field trip to an old folks home:
The ensuing passage is unsavoury on multiple levels. First, it describes a transgression of the still intact laws on oral sex, consensual or otherwise. Second, its events are supremely contrary to our moral imperative that the young respect the aged, rather than sitting on their faces with an index finger stuck up their posteriors. Third, it represents a hazardous model for our youth to emulate. What is to stop our students from similarly initiating sex with older men on their pastoral care trips, and then, in imitation of Vladimir Koh Nah Bay, joining the Interact Club in order to visit the home every weekend, both Saturdays and Sundays, while their oblivious teachers stand by and nod in approval? Vladimir Koh has not even the decency to commit to his first victim, having exhausted him within a month to a state of catatonia. Our department was profoundly disturbed by the graphic accounts of the character's promiscuous consortings with his elderly charges, in three different charity homes, two hospices and an ICU. Details of "snowy-white pubes" and "marvellous buttocks, furrowed like hardwood lichens" and his ingenious use of false teeth as a device for mutual pleasure were both gratuitous and unnecessary. Vladimir's consequent graduation from junior college and enlistment in the army came as a momentary relief for those of us who hoped that the work might then evolve into a more conventional coming-of-age novella. We were thus dismayed by the author's monomaniac focus on the sexual development of his character, representing scene after scene of furtive coition on the part of the hero with a rapid succession of warrant officers, majors, colonels, lieutenant-colonels, generals and canteen uncles. And I quote:
We need not list, as the author does with distressing gusto, the chapters that trace Vladimir's dalliances with scholarship boards and university professors, nor his entanglements, upon securing work in a government-linked corporation, with senior civil servants, rival CEOs, foreign trade delegations and a preternatural array of Japanese businessmen. Far too many officers in our department have had the misfortune of being called on to review this filth, and have spent sleepless nights attempting to recover from the psychological trauma. It is, in addition, irresponsible and unrealistic to portray such a character as Vladimir as being able to shoot to the upper echelons of Singapore commerce and politics while retaining his sculpted, youthful appearance together with the libido and sexual endurance of a horse. It pains me to speak further of this text, but I have yet to highlight the author's most shameful literary transgression, which begins in Chapter 69, during National Day Celebrations, when seated in proximity to the Members of Parliament.
Who is this politician the author refers to? The one he calls "Lee Low Tar"? Oh, he may think he is very clever, but he has dug his own grave with a fiction that is libelous; nay, deserving of excommunication for its sin! What twisted anger rests in this man's soul, that he would compose the twenty-page scene that follows in the National Stadium shower rooms, with three hundred schoolchildren in glitter makeup hammering at the door demanding to be allowed to urinate? Never shall I be able to look at a chemiluminescent lightstick, a miniature flag, nor a string of orchids the same way ever, ever again! The sadist! Why, he even made him cry! For my part, I had ample reason to cry as the story continued with the elopement of Vladimir and said politician to Suzhou, with honeymoon vignettes that made me want to wash my eyes with bleach! Has the author no gratitude for his role in our nation's development, or at least on behalf of his community, for the recent comments on the eventual repeal of our sodomy laws? After all, it is not this man who is plagued by rumours about his – but I say too much. The board was ultimately calmed by the author's decision to eventually dissolve this cursed union.
The book's conclusion, however, is far from satisfactory. As Vladimir Koh absconds to continue his venereal peregrinations across the globe, Lee Low Tar returns to the country and institutes a series of campaigns encouraging the worship of old men as sexual objects. Their nation, which remains cunningly (but not cunningly enough) unnamed, thus becomes a haven for elderly males, as gerontophilia becomes the norm, with even senior citizens competing amongst themselves over who can have the oldest boyfriend. Romances between those under 40 years of age becomes frowned upon and censored as obscene, and youth are frustrated in their passions, though they live in the knowledge that as they age, every day brings them closer to carnal bliss. To recapitulate: under threat of legal action, you will not, I repeat, you must not read "Lee Low Tar" at your literary evening. If you are discovered to be distributing copies either in print or electronically you shall be fined and charged under the Sedition Act and detained in a room with hyperactive air conditioning. The story espouses values entirely opposite to those treasured by our Asian forefathers and tars the image of persons who shall go unmentioned and incites lust for activities against the order of nature. You see, it is not without grounds that we make these statements. The MAD has a policy against sanctioning media that "promote homosexuality", and "Lee Low Tar", sadly, has been all too effective in this area. I myself first began to realise the hazards of reading the story on page 52, during the scene in the principal's office, when I began to fondly recall being caned by the discipline master in my school. From then on I read the text with a mixture of apprehension and feverish agitation, as I began to recognise in Vladimir's ardent romps something not unlike my own fantasies. I read and read until ten o'clock at night, when the 63 year-old janitor came in to clean the windows and empty the wastebaskets. Suffice it to say that the wastebaskets were not the only things that were emptied that night. Racked with self-loathing, I transferred this assignment to one of my fellow officers, who shall also go unnamed. For the following week, he together with five singlet-wearing uncles in his void deck were arrested for public indecency, involving several Chinese chesspieces and a singing mynah-bird. The officer he had passed the file to had disappeared from his home, leaving only a tainted bottle of Guinness stout and a used prophylactic. And so on, and so on, until I realised, that to halt the damage, I alone would have to complete the report. I write this letter from under the desk of my Permanent Secretary, as has become my habit, in order to better admire the curvature in his trousers. For the love of God, and for the sake of our country's future, do not let this story be read. In addition, we hope to expedite a commissioned work with Ovidia Yu. She, as a treasured resource on feminine issues, would surely be able to compose an antidote tale to straighten us out. Yours faithfully, (Name and position withheld) * * * * * Note: The author is aware that there is a high chance this text may not be permitted for public reading during IndigNation, and thus has supplied a backup text (an extract from his university memoir, "Diary of a Stone Monkey"). He nonetheless wishes to make it clear that "Lee Low Tar" was written specifically for this reading, and is his preferred text for the night. MDA will of course be aware that the denial of a licence to read this story will generate negative publicity for itself while increasing public interest in the story, allowing its for its greater distribution. Should the story be approved, the
author will ensure that an announcement is made before this and any future
readings that the below letter is entirely fictional, as are the
characters featured within (save for the names of himself and his friend
Ovidia Yu).]
|
|
|
|
Footnotes None Addenda None
|
|