Yawning Bread. 27 September 2008

Viewer advisories and the laugh test


    

 

 

I think it was Karl Marx who said that all dialectical systems contain within themselves internal contradictions that lie at the root of change and development. These contradictions build up or reveal themselves gradually, but the changes that occur tend to be abrupt, when tension has built up enough.

Breaking free from the jargon, what it really means is that rules and policies that once seemed reasonable, start to make less and less sense as conditions change. These conditions include human consciousness. We begin to see the world in a different light, and the rules and policies that are with us begin to look more and more ridiculous.

Now, follies and absurdities can be the tiniest things found in the most unlikely places. But they will illustrate something that speaks to a larger issue in Singapore.  I came across one last week.

* * * * *

Around 12 midnight last Thursday (18 September), I turned on the television, only to discover I was on Channel 5 instead of Channel NewsAsia. I was about to change the channel when I caught a brief announcement prior to the airing of an episode of the series, Janice Dickinson Modelling Agency. This announcement, inserted by Mediacorp, warned viewers that the show to follow contained "adult themes".

"Adult themes" in Singapore's censorship-speak is almost always used to refer to gay and lesbian content. Our God-fearing Christian bureaucrats cannot even bring themselves to use accurate language but have mandated euphemisms. 

Intrigued, I stayed on Channel 5 to watch the show instead of going over to the news channel.

Now, for those of you who are unfamiliar with it, the Janice Dickinson Modelling Agency is a reality show with the camera following former supermodel Janice Dickinson as she runs her new business. A typical episode has her models (male and female) parading in various degrees of undress for clients to select, followed by scenes of photoshoots and runway shows, often with a lot of skin.

Here are some stills from the series, to give you a flavour of what's on screen:

 

   

 

Do all episodes of this series carry an "adult theme" warning? A friend who has caught quite a few of them told me he didn't recall any. To prove it to myself, I took the trouble to catch the following week's episode. It didn't have the warning. So, there was something about the episode aired just past midnight on 18 September (actually 19 September) that necessitated the warning.

What could it have been? Two possibilities come to mind: The episode that I caught had a towel-drop scene and a coming out scene.

Towel-drop. Janice Dickinson supplied 3 girls to be number bearers at an International Fighting League (IFL) event in Portland, Oregon. Prior to the fight itself, the models were to be towel girls at the weigh-in. One of the IFL fighters mischievously pulled the towel down during his weigh-in, exposing himself to the media. Desiree, one of Janice's models standing next to him, got extremely upset over the exposure, and her inability to continue doing the show after that -- she was an emotional wreck -- would be the human drama in that episode. (See, however, my comments at right).

The towel drop was blurred out in the final cut that was broadcasted, as you can see here. (Click the image for the clip from Blinkx)


Shown on television, Desiree is the girl at left, walking off

 
But I know my readers want to see the real thing, so I did a bit of sleuthing and found it on brightcove/perezhilton.com. (Click image for the clip)


Not shown on television


American hypocrisy

I thought the model's distress over seeing a penis reflected very well the acute hypocrisy that lies at the heart of contemporary American culture.

Here was a girl whose job and career ambition involved wearing as little as possible and oozing sex in every pose she struck. Yet, Desiree felt violated the moment someone confronted her with a bit of sexual anatomy.

I don't doubt the depth of her distress, but one has to ask, what kind of society produces such mindsets?

 

Coming out. The other reason why an "adult theme" warning might have been issued was the 5 minutes of the episode in which Janice was shown asking one of her models, J P Calderon, whether he would agree to pose for the cover of Instinct magazine. This was an attractive modelling job, giving the guy a great career boost, but it came with a catch: Instinct was a gay magazine, and the cover model would also be featured in a story about himself being gay. That meant that J P Calderon had to come out as gay in order to get the job. He thought about it and later agreed. 

Calderon was in street clothes when he was shown speaking with Janice over this; later he was in a swimsuit for the photoshoot. On the right is the final photo selected for the magazine cover (Feb 2007 issue), and below is another ogle-worthy pic of him.

Which of these two elements triggered Mediacorp's "adult theme" warning? 

I really do not think the towel drop triggered the "adult theme" warning, especially as the boxer's genitals were blurred out. 

Much more consistent with what we know of Singapore's censorship policies, would be that it was the coming out of J P Calderon that triggered it.

The Media Development Authority (i.e. the state censors) have on previous occasions fined TV stations for airing documentaries and talk shows wherein interviewees spoke of their being gay. Just earlier this year, Mediacorp was fined S$15,000 for airing another reality show with a gay couple in it (see box at right). The broadcaster must have taken the lesson to heart and inserted the "adult theme" warning into this episode of the Janice Dickinson Modelling Agency for this reason.


J P Calderon

Does such a policy not fail the laugh test? Here is a series with models in underwear (sometimes less) every other minute. The camera lingers on their curves -- in the stills above, note how low the camera angles are -- and the whole point of the business is to sell lust. You can show any amount of skin, albeit on a late-night slot, and no warning is necessary, so long as it is heterosexual skin. But the moment someone, fully clothed and sitting on a couch, declares himself gay, it's a transgression that people should be forewarned about in case they suffer shock. Marx must be chuckling in his grave.

© Yawning Bread 


 

 

 

 

 

 

25 April 2008
Wobao (MyPaper)

MediaCorp fined for airing show featuring gay couple

Broadcaster MediaCorp TV has been fined $15,000 by the Media Development Authority (MDA) for airing a show that featured a gay couple and their adopted baby.

The MDA said yesterday that an episode of an acquired home and decor series, Find and Design, "normalises and promotes a gay lifestyle". In the episode - aired on Channel 5 at 7.30am on Sunday, Jan 13 - the host helped a gay couple turn their game room into a nursery for their adopted baby.

The MDA objected to several scenes of the couple and their baby together, and the host's acknowledgement of the pair as a family.

It said they breached the Free-to-Air TV Programme Code, "which disallows programmes that promote, justify or glamorise gay lifestyles".

The MDA had consulted the Programme Advisory Committee for English Programmes, which frowned on the episode's presentation of a gay relationship as an acceptable family unit, and its airing during family viewing hours.

Mr Kenneth Liang, executive vice-president of programming and production for Channel 5, told The Straits Times that regulations were open to interpretation.

He said: "In this case, we overstepped the line. We understand the OB (out-of-bounds) markers in this area more clearly now, and this won't happen again."

This is MediaCorp TV's second breach of the code.

In 2002, it was fined $10,000 for airing offensive footage from a sex-scandal video of Taiwanese legislator Chu Mei-Feng, on Channel 8's News 8 at 10.

 

 

Footnotes

None

Addenda

None