| September
2005
Feverish minds cook up the wrath of God
|
|
|
|
When hurricane Katrina struck New Orleans virtually on the eve of the annual gay parade Southern Decadence [1], I knew that some bigot somewhere would say the storm and flooding were punishments from the Christian God for what they would surely allege as debauchery.
|
||
Indeed, a bigot did. The Philadelphia-based
Repent America website (director Michael Marcavage) issued an opinion
that said,
Further on,
Then in conclusion,
On the website www.godhatesamerica.com, was a short note, titled, "Thank God for Katrina". It said,
Lovely! How compassionate! On the online forum http://fcnforums.christianity.com/, someone using the nick "Shinedupon" wrote:
While another, with the nick "BlessedHope" wrote:
Anyway, as I said, none of the above was a surprise. Muslim clerics had said similar things when the tsunami struck 8 months earlier (more below). Instead, what really threw me was a mention in the Australian newspaper The Age, on 3 September 2005, that Katrina had something to do with Gaza [2].
In a similar vein, Christian journalist Stan Goodenough writing from Israel, said he was struck by the juxtaposition in recent days of Jewish settlers being removed from their homes in the Gaza Strip and Americans being forced out of their homes in New Orleans. In a column he wrote for the website Jerusalem Newswire (as reported by the Washington Post, 4 Sep 2005), he said
* * * * * |
|
|
|
These fundamentalists conceive of a vengeful god. Secondly, they rely on a very literal interpretation of scripture to decide right from wrong, even to the extent of taking their holy book at its word and becoming blinkeredly Zionist (since the origin of that holy book was essentially a Jewish founding story). They conceive of a cosmic order where if a society does "wrong", then the entire society will be punished through the wrath of their deity. If this reminds you of how in primitive societies, when a person violated some code of conduct, the entire tribe to which he belonged could be punished or made liable for compensation, it is no coincidence. These bigots' frame of mind is just as primitive. In name, they may call theirs the God of Love, but every indication from their words and deeds suggest that theirs is a God of Punishment. In a sense, their ideas of religiousity and morality are little evolved from that of a 3 year-old. What is right or wrong depends starkly on what will get you rewarded or punished by daddy and mommy. Except that there is a twist: whereas punishment by daddy and mommy can be objectively verified, Katrina as punishment by an almighty is no more than a figment of these fundamentalists' imagination. The entire confection, about natural disasters as punishment, and what particular human behaviour had merited that supposed punishment, is an elaborate construct. Many people may hold the (completely erroneous) view that homosexuality is bad, and therefore they can't see that the supposedly bad behaviour ("homosexual sin and wickedness") is just as entirely cooked up by feverish human minds. This is where the Gaza angle, I thought, was unusually illuminating. You really have to belong to a tiny obsessed minority to think that evicting the Jewish settlers and quitting the ungovernable Gaza strip ("give up any part of their rightful God-given land") was "against the will of God." You really have to be blind to human suffering to ignore the plight of the Palestinians and their perfectly legitimate desire for their own nation-state (legitimate to the extent that a reasonable compromise with Israel may allow). The absurdity of this claim -- that Katrina was the deity's punishment for America abandoning Israel such that Israel could not but leave the Gaza strip -- shows up equally the absurdity of the parallel claim that Katrina was punishment for Southern Decadence and its associated "evils". * * * * * Meanwhile, the Muslim Palestinians were praising their God and thanking Him for delivering them from the Israelis. But let me be evenhanded in aiming my guns at all fanatics, whatever the religion. Mere days after the Boxing Day tsunami struck and killed over 200,000 people around the shores of the Indian Ocean on 26 December 2004, a leading cleric from Saudi Arabia, Sheik Fawzan Al-Fawzan, said,
Other Muslim clerics chimed in. Maulana Shafayat Mohammed, from Trinidad said on his website, www.alhikmat.com,
He then quoted research by Peter Cordingley and Alison Dakota Gee (his reference was Asiaweek magazine) which said, "Southeast Asia is now the No. 1 world destination for tourists looking for sex." Maulana Shafayat Mohammed went on to make specific mention of child sex tourism in Sri Lanka, how there was no sharp divide between heterosexuality and homosexuality in Thailand -- is that bad? he seemed to think so -- and how Bangkok and other Thai cities had a thriving gay scene. The Qu'ran, he reminded his readers, enjoined homosexuality through the story of Lut. And then he attempted to seal his argument by saying that the Bible and the Torah too had proscriptions against homosexuality. (But he forgot to mention that all three are really the same source speaking in different voices, so instead of getting corroboration, he just revealed how weak his case was). But what did he care? It didn't stop him from saying,
"God" here refers to the the deity known as Jehovah, Yahweh or Allah. Those who pay homage to Hindu, Taoist, Inca, Greek or other Gods need not apply... you do not, by his definition, believe in God. From London, Yusuf al-Qaradawi, issued a sermon (as reported by The Times and on BBC TV News on 11 January 2005) which was broadcast over Qatar TV. al-Qaradawi said,
Obviously, with so much reference to tourism, they were all thinking of the beach resorts of Phuket (about 7,500 dead and missing) and Sri Lanka (about 35,000 dead and missing). Somehow, the long stretches of the Southeast Indian coast (about 9,000 dead and missing) where there was hardly any tourism, was forgotten by these clerics. As was the Andaman and Nicobar islands (another 7,500 dead or missing). More significantly, the 165,000 dead and missing (far surpassing the toll from anywhere else) in Aceh, Indonesia, didn't figure in their minds either. Aceh is an unusually devout Muslim province, and if anyone had suggested it as a centre of sex tourism, or any kind of tourism for that matter, he would have been treated as a fool. But inconvenient facts cannot be allowed
to stand in the way of such a seductive story of almighty wrath, can it? © Yawning Bread
|
|
|
|
Footnotes
Addenda None
|
|