| November 2004
Islam in Malaysia: the modern, the foreign and the traditional
|
|
|
|
Now, in these days of
religious fanatics carrying out terrorist attacks on the basis of their
own warped ideas, we've all become sensitised to Islam's internal debate.
It's an interesting subject to us now, even if we are not Muslims
ourselves. So where previously, we might have walked right past something,
today, we stop, look and think about it a little. The first encounter It was an open-air
concert in the evening. On stage were 4 young men singing
what sounded like soft pop. The disconnect was in the way they
dressed. They were wearing traditional Malay costumes, made of shiny
cloth, complete with gold-threaded sarongs and, on their heads, songkoks. I thought that was strange indeed. Usually pop bands ape the West.
Here, on the other hand,
was a group that was dressed more for a traditional wedding, but singing
in a major key that Beethoven would have recognised, with guitar and
synthesizer backgrounds. And then I noticed they were singing in English,
not Malay, though the diction was so bad I had to strain to catch the
words. But when I did, the
picture became clear. The lyrics were, of course, banal, but
interestingly, they consisted of phrases like, "to live the good
life" and "it doesn't matter what others think". The song
was the Muslim equivalent of church pop music. And like much of church
pop, it was truly bad music. The melodic line and chord progressions were
unadventurous. It kept boringly to the same AABA structure, multiplied
into stanza-stanza-chorus followed by stanza-chorus and another
stanza-chorus, all the while plodding along in predictable 8-bar and
16-bar formations. There was no development whatsoever. It never changed
key. The pace was moderato throughout; the cadences, cloyingly sweet to
the point of unbearable. Voice levels were held at medium strength, little
by way of crescendo, diminuendo or anything you might call vocal effects. It was music for the
unmusical. For the pedantic of mind. For those whose conservatism in life
ruled out any experimentation in music. For those who, in believing the
injunction to be chaste, could only stomach songs washed of all artistic
passion. Despite its poor
quality, this song that the 4 young men sang spoke volumes about where
some Muslims stand today. Here is an attempt to make the religion
appealing to a new generation of Malaysians who have grown accustomed to a
modern world, whose idea of music is pop, and whose ears are tuned only to
the 12-note octave from the Western tradition. It's an effort to make the
religion appear "with-it" when the words are sung in English,
not Malay. It's a desire to keep the religion relevant, drawn from the
example of Protestant churches in the West, who themselves adopted the
soft pop idiom only 30 – 40 years ago. Yet, the lyrics also
spoke of the unique difficulties of Islam: "It doesn't matter what
others think." In there is a little clue to the side-glances from not
just non-Muslims, but also from non-practising Muslims, thrown at those
who try to remain devout. Are those side-glances
justified? For that we have to step beyond the medium to the message. What
the values that go with being devout? The second encounter A few days after Hari
Raya Aidil Fitri, I caught a glimpse of a Malaysian TV program. The scene
that went by had four men (one middle-aged, three much younger) sitting
around a dining table saying grace before their meal. But included in the
scene was a woman. She was not seated at the table, but standing apart
from the group, though she too joined in saying grace. She stood near a
door, presumably the door leading to the kitchen. One would assume that
she was the hostess, perhaps the wife of the older man. In an instant, one is
reminded of the separation of sexes that Islam imposes. Moreover, from the
way the woman is excluded from the table, it reminds one of the
subordinate status of women, and how their role is to hover around and
serve the men. It seems relatively
easier to adopt the veneer of modernisation, through soft pop devotional
songs sung to a Western beat, than to seriously examine and overturn
discrimination and injustices perpetuated in the name of religion. The tensions that arise from clash between archaic interpretations and modern secular life can sometimes become quite acute, as my next story illustrates. The third encounter The setting was the
shopping mall under the Petronas Twin Towers, modern, swanky and very
popular. In the centre court on the day that I was there, a fashion show
was in progress. Leggy models clad in translucent gowns with low collars
and high slits kept everyone transfixed. Powerful sound systems invaded
the space with an obsessive beat. Glamour, hypnosis and seduction mixed
together, making the moment narcotic. Almost right in front
of the stage were two Arab men, their eyes locked, entranced by the models
on the ramp. Two steps behind them, were four of their women, covered head
to toe in black, faces veiled, with mere slits for their eyes. The Wahhabi
justification for covering women up in black tents is to avoid the sin of
lust. Men are believed to suffer uncontrollable urges at the very sight of
women, even just their hair. To ensure an earth free of temptation, women
must be imprisoned in the tightest of social rules and have their
personhoods smothered by these all-enveloping cloaks. But what should one do
when medieval habits run into a fashion show? Should good Muslim men avert
their eyes? But if Muslim men have to avert their eyes to avoid falling
into sin, while non-Muslims don't avert their eyes, and yet don't
automatically become sex maniacs, doesn't that raise a question whether
there was any need to avert one's eyes in the first place? And if men can safely
look at women, even stunningly beautiful young women in translucent
fabrics lifted high with every cantering step they make on the ramp, why
can't the same men safely look at Muslim women? In which case, why do
Muslim women need to be all covered up? In the encounter with
the modern world, isn't the original justification proven false? But no one is asking
such questions today. After the show, the Arab men wave their hands,
signalling their harem to follow. The men walk ahead, the tents follow,
secure in the knowledge that no one is leering at them, and all is in
order under God. * * * * * The Wahhabi influence
is foreign to Malaysia. Traditionally, Malays have practised a mild,
tolerant form of Islam, incorporating many cultural elements from their
pre-Islamic past. But, in the last 20 – 30 years, an austere, sometimes
literal form of Islam, originating from Arabia, has gained more than a
foothold in the country. While those 2 Arab men and their women were not
Malaysians, but tourists – Malaysia woos many tourists from the Middle
East – that encounter points at the difficulty reconciling the
look-back-to-the-past strain of Islam with the modern world. The other two
encounters illustrate different aspects of the struggle within Malaysian
Islam. The stunning difference, to Singaporean eyes at least, is that in
Malaysia, the contest is right there in the public domain. In Singapore,
because Islam is a minority religion, because our government dislikes
religious issues taking forestage in the media or on the streets,
preferring it kept within mosques, churches or temples, we rarely get the
chance to spot such interesting exemplars of our time. © Yawning Bread |
||
|
Footnotes None Addenda None
|
|