| November 2004
It's my birthday, spend money on me
|
|
|
|
* * * * * Every now and then in
my years of managing people, I come across leave applications. The type
that still bemuses me is that which is for just one day where the reason
is "celebrating my birthday". Call me a dolt, but I
still can't figure out how one's birthday is meaningful to anyone but
oneself, and why anybody else should "celebrate" this day. But
obviously, if someone takes the day off on account of "celebrating
his birthday", some kind of party must be in the works. After all,
it's difficult to imagine him spending the day in solitary meditation. And indeed a party is
what happens. Friends are told, "It's my birthday this Sunday, come
to my party," and then they are left scrambling for money to buy a
present. Fortunately, I am past
the age when I get many of such invitations. Most of my friends, in my age
group, let birthdays go by quietly. Maybe they think like me – why
should my birthday interest anyone else? – or the number of years adding
up is getting too large to draw attention to. It seems then, that
taking the day off to celebrate one's birthday tends to involve younger
folks. |
||
|
It may simply be that
younger people feel a greater need to socialise, more than older adults.
'Birthday' is just a convenient excuse. They just need to hang out
together, to bond, to renew their sense of fraternity. What's wrong with
that? Rationally speaking,
nothing wrong at all. Humans are social animals, and our social
relationships will prove useful in many ways at other times, so they are
worth cultivating. Nor should we be such wet blankets to think that having
a good time is some kind of self-indulgent sin. But what still bothers
me is the use of the birthday excuse. It bothers me that this creates an
obligation on the invitee's part to stump up money and bring a gift. It's
fine to throw a party, pay for it yourself and ask your friends to come.
It's not the same to create an event and expect others to incur costs for
it. Nor is it fine that we
don't see the distinction. I think it is an important test of character to
be always aware of the consequences of one's actions upon others.
Sometimes making others feel obliged is unavoidable, but clearly not those
times when the point of the exercise is to crown the vanity of one's
birthday. * * * * * Am I being too austere?
Don't I, in other essays here, rail against puritans? Indeed, I do, but I am
still being consistent. The puritanism I rail against is the imposition
of moral codes upon others, especially through coercive means like law,
censorship and social disbarment. Here, I am talking about the cultivation
of the self and the abjuring of vanity; about the importance of not
imposing upon others. © Yawning Bread
|
|
|
|
Footnotes None Addenda None
|
|