| What
was exceptional about this story however, was the degree of support
Philip Lim got from many of his former pupils. Singaporeans seldom stick
their necks out, especially for unpopular or lost causes. Culturally --
or so it is said – we prefer to keep our heads down, blend in, go with
the mainstream. Stick with the group. Don't rock the boat. We're
unoriginal conformists, that's why we have so few entrepreneurs and so
little creativity. Philip Lim's case would certainly be a lost cause
since he was pleading guilty. His homosexual orientation and the charge
of paedophilia would not be in the running for popularity.
Yet, at least 87 of his former pupils got together to demonstrate support,
writing testimonials, visiting him in jail and showing up at court. On each day that the Straits
Times reported on the case, the paper carried a fresh photograph of a
bunch of late teenagers and 20-ish young men trooping into the
courthouse. All of a sudden, we have to add this dissonant picture to
our mental image of safe, obedient Singapore.
Without having interviewed the young men, there's little I can add about their thoughts and
motivation, beyond what have been reported in the newspaper
reports. But on the face of it, it looks once again like something we've
always known, that when you get to know a person well, and then find out
that he is homosexual (and in this case that he abused his charges!),
the sexuality is a minor issue. Your regard for that person is,
typically, not devalued by it.
Yet, while private opinion is one thing, to band together to show support
is something else. In the case of the younger ones shown in newspaper
photographs, who don't look over 18, one wonders what their parents
might have to say about their sons being shown marching to court.
Somewhere here is an indicator of attitudinal change. Lost causes are
not untouchable and gay tutors – even one accused of paedophilia --
are not pariahs.
The value of the
erotic
I think we know, even if sometimes, we don't wish to articulate it,
that sexuality may have everything to do with Philip Lim as a good
teacher. The erotic is a powerful motivator. That Lim only chose to
tutor boys, not girls, suggested that it was a major consideration for
him. Erotic interest probably drove his passion, and sustained his
dedication and attentiveness to his boys. The boys might not have known
(or perhaps some did?) about the underlying erotic interest, but they
surely appreciated the resulting care and concern.
It is an uncomfortable thought that the erotic can be so intrinsic to
the quality of a person's work, especially teaching, but if you think
about it, why shouldn't that be so? The erotic is, after all, a powerful
motivator in life generally.
This is a good instance for us to examine why we expect to divorce
the erotic from our work, particularly, from teaching and parenting.
Yes, when it spills over to abuse, it is inexcusable, and here abuse
means anything which leads to physical or mental pain -- e.g. burning
children with cigarette butts or making them work 14 hours a day weaving
carpets, as much as sexual abuse.
|
Straits Times
Sat, 8 March 2003
52-year-old man admits
sexually abusing five boys
By Elena Chong
More than 50 former students of a private tutor turned up at
the High Court yesterday to support the man hauled up on
multiple charges of unnatural sex and acts of gross indecency
against five teenage boys.
The group, comprising mostly men in their 20s and 30s, heard
Philip Lim Beng Cheok, a mathematics tutor for more than 20
years, plead guilty to 10 counts of sexually abusing the 13- to
15-year-olds at his flat in Ang Mo Kio.
All except one of the 57 charges against him were for
committing acts of gross indecency and unnatural sex at his home
between December 2000 and July 20 last year. The remaining
charge was for having obscene films.
The prosecutor said that the 52-year-old bachelor, who has
eight older brothers and a sister, was a homosexual by his own
admission and that he had been diagnosed to be suffering from
paedophilia.
His lawyer described him as a character-builder with a golden
heart.
Two of his victims are now undergoing counselling. One is a
14-year-old, whose experience in his 16 months under Lim was so
horrible, said a senior consultant psychiatrist, that he was
still angry and hated his stepfather and mother for sending him
to the man for tuition.
The psychiatrist added that the other victim, a 16-year-old,
had developed a post-traumatic stress disorder: He felt guilty
over what had happened, and had flashbacks and nightmares of Lim
coming to kill him and his parents.
In most cases, Lim masturbated the boys, performed oral sex
on them and got them to do the same to him. On one occasion, he
got two boys to masturbate each other. When asked why he carried
out such acts, he told the police that it was to 'educate' his
students about sex and 'help' them release their sexual tension.
He used a variety of ways to lure the boys to commit the lewd
acts. Sometimes, a discussion about sex was used as a
springboard; on other occasions, he would invite them to his
bedroom and undress them.
Deputy Public Prosecutor Imran Abdul Hamid said that the
parents of the five boys engaged Lim after hearing that he was a
good tutor.
Some students, he added, had lived with him at the flat or
stayed over occasionally, usually just before the school
examinations, so he could give them extra lessons then.
Lim, he said, was stern and demanding, and punished students
if they misbehaved or were disobedient.
The 14-year-old, who was tutored by him from November 2000,
moved into Lim's flat in September 2001 after Lim had suggested
to the boy's mother that it would be more convenient for her son
as his flat was nearer to the school. The boy was abused two
months later.
The boy made a police report only on July 27 last year after
his school psychologist noticed a significant deterioration in
his attitude towards his mother and school work.
But defence counsel Lee Teck Leng painted a glowing picture
of Lim in his mitigation plea, citing some of the 87
testimonials from his former students to show that he was not a
predatory monster but a man of good character.
He said the man, who was addressed simply as 'Sir' by some of
his former students, was an extraordinary and dedicated maths
tutor who cared for his students, and had changed many potential
juvenile delinquents into good boys and men.
The lawyer added that he was a filial son who inculcated
filial piety in his students and encouraged them to do
charitable deeds for the less fortunate.
Mr Lee said that the acts were consensual and no threat or
force was used.
His former students had created a website after his arrest
last year to keep every one
nformed of the case, the lawyer
added.
Justice Woo Bih Li will pass sentence on Monday. |
|
But there is more than that. Are we trying hard, paddling furiously
against the current, to deny that teachers can be driven by the erotic?
If so, why? Is it because we continue to see the erotic in
Judeo-Christian terms, as an ungodly contaminant? Is sex, of any degree,
a kind of defilement? Must lust necessarily be a bad thing?
Let me put it to you this way: we blind ourselves with irrational
religious or cultural attitudes against the erotic, and by so doing, we
pass up on harnessing its power to getting good work done. If we could
lighten up about sex, might our relationships be healthier? Might we be
more honest in what we do and why? Might teenage boys be more
worldly-wise, and thereby more empowered to stand their ground against
adults crossing the line? Might we get more good teachers, and keep them
as good teachers, with avenues to discuss and resolve their conflicts?
* * * * *
Yawning Bread wrote an email letter to
reporter Chong Chee Kin on 12 March 2003:
I refer to your news
story on the tutor who abused his pupils. I'd like to comment on the
phrase used in the report on 11 March "a self-confessed homosexual
who was diagnosed as a paedophile after his arrest".
I think there are better
ways of describing the fact that Lim, the accused, considered himself a
homosexual person than the term "self-confessed". Confession
implies guilt, e.g. "self-confessed kleptomaniac",
"self-confessed glue-sniffer", and by using those words, you
attach guilt to homosexual orientation.
I note that in fact this
was not your intention. I believe you took care to separate his
paedophilia from his sexual orientation.
How else might a reporter
have described the fact that he was homosexual? One could have said,
"Lim, who acknowledged that he was homosexual, was diagnosed as a
paedophile after his arrest".
Going further, why was it
necessary to specify that Lim was homosexual, since it had little to do
with the offence?
In this connection,
please refer to the story the same 11 March, about a port worker given
30 years' jail for abusing his stepdaughter. Nowhere in that story is
the accused described as a heterosexual, let alone a
"self-confessed heterosexual".
One might conceivably
argue that Lim's homosexuality is newsworthy even if unconnected to the
crime. But surely every good newspaperman knows that what is newsworthy
or not is to a large extent the creation of the media themselves?
If you refer to modern
reports of paedophilia from global news agencies - and alas there are
ghastly ones involving boys and girls from around the world - you will
note that they seldom bring the sexual orientation of the accused into
the story, whether homosexual or heterosexual. They just state the sex
of the children abused, sometimes not even that, because it is the fact
that they are minors that is the fulcrum of the crime, not the gender or
sexuality involved.
We expect from the
professionalism of journalists to be careful with reporting of side
issues, so as not to attach guilt by association where it is not
warranted.
* * * * *
|
Straits
Times
Tue, 11 March 2003
18 years for
tutor who preyed on students
Although accused had taken
advantage of his charges, 87 ex-students show him support with
glowing testimonials
By Chong
Chee Kin
In the dock was a man who had
confessed readily to sexually abusing five boys he was tutoring.
In the public gallery were about
60 of his ex-students, from teenage boys to men in their 30s,
who turned up to show support for Philip Lim Beng Cheok, 52, who
had tutored them in mathematics at various times over the past
20 years. Their
dismay was palpable when sentence was passed 18 years' jail.
Lim, said Justice Woo Bih Li, was
an 'extraordinary man' - in both a positive and perverse way.
He had turned the lives of some
of his former students around - rescuing juvenile delinquents
from street gangs and tutoring them for free. But
he had also abused his position of authority and trust when he
got five boys - aged between 13 and 15 - to commit lewd acts in
his Ang Mo Kio flat between December 2000 and July last year.
'The fact that your students look
upon you as their mentor...is an aggravating factor,' the judge
said.
'You have taken advantage of
them, and the sentence must reflect the public abhorrence of
such acts.'
Deputy Public Prosecutor Imran
Abdul Hamid had urged the court for a deterrent sentence of over
20 years, saying that Lim had abused his victims' trust and
posed a danger to young boys.
He also produced medical reports
to argue that there was a high chance that people like Lim - a
self-confessed homosexual who was diagnosed as a paedophile
after his arrest - would revert to their old ways.
He told the court
that Lim's victims were especially vulnerable to him because he
had 'unrestricted access' to them.
In deciding on an 18-year jail
term, the judge told Lim 'As you were able to instil discipline
in your students, I am of the view that there is a fair chance
that you would be able to do likewise for yourself, so as to
refrain from ever abusing male children.'
By most accounts, Lim, who
tutored boys exclusively, was a good teacher. He was paid $150 a
month for each student. He
taught the boys in a group in his flat, where he lived alone,
and exercised iron discipline over them. Some of them, including
two of the five who were abused, sometimes stayed over,
especially when examinations were near.
But Lim had other plans besides
teaching.
He summoned his victims to
another room and through a variety of ways - whether through a
discussion of sex or threats to cut them off or stop his lessons
- got them to take part in sex acts with him, or with each
other.
His deeds would not have been
uncovered if a school counsellor of one of the five boys had not
taken the boy aside to ask him why his attitude towards work and
his relationship with his mother had deteriorated.
That was when police
stepped in and the other four boys, all from good schools,
admitted that they had been abused too.
Though filled with shame and
embarrassment, two of the boys told a government psychiatrist
that they still held their ex-tutor in high esteem.
One even said he did not want to
tell his parents what had happened because he was afraid they
would stop the tuition and his maths results would suffer.
A relative of one of the boys who
was also an ex-student of Lim's told The Straits Times 'When we
first found out, we were so disappointed that he had done that
kind of thing. We cannot believe that someone whom we had so
much respect for would do something like that.' Despite
this, he penned a glowing testimonial for Lim. 'I really owe him
a lot. Despite getting scolded when I did not study, I still
respect him a lot.
'His kindness is something I will
not be able to repay,' he wrote.
He was just one of 87 ex-students
who did so - a point that Justice Woo described as a 'strong
mitigating factor'.
To his
ex-students, who included high-ranking civil servants,
professionals and academics, the idea that the man they called
'Sir' was capable of such acts was unbelievable.
After the news of the arrest in
July last year, engineer Kelvin Loh, 25, who knew Lim in 1994,
set up a website for all former students to keep them updated on
their mentor's case. On
it, the former students rostered themselves to visit Lim at the
Queenstown Remand Prison on different days.
They avoided the circumstances of
his arrest when they met, but with at least one ex-student, Mr
Anthony Pang, 31, a manager, Lim broached it himself.
'When I met him, he was very
remorseful and asked us to forgive him,' he told The Straits
Times.
Their testimonials were filled
with stories about how Lim had helped them not just with their
schoolwork, but even with their personal lives. Trader
See Kok Lim said in his testimonial that Lim helped him escape
from a gang in his youth by paying the gang leader for his
release.
Mr Yang Siew Ping, 35, a
contractor, told of how Lim had tutored him for free when his
family had financial problems, got him out of a secret society
and helped him pass his O-level examinations in 1984.
Lim himself did not expect the
show of support, said his lawyer, Mr Lee Teck Ling.
'He was moved when he read the
testimonials. He said he never knew what he meant to them. To
him, helping them in their lives and education was just a job,'
he said.
Asked if they would visit him,
all his former students said they would.
'Regardless of what he had done,
we still hold him in high regard. To us, he will always be our
mentor and our best friend,' Mr Yang said.
|
|
|
Compare the two cases
Did you notice the coincidence of two
child-abuse cases appearing before the same judge? Philip Lim, the tutor
got 18 years. the stepfather got 30. We
can argue whether 18 or 30 is too harsh, but given the facts
of each case, we can't say one was disproportionate to the other. You
see in these two cases, how our justice system did not let sexual
orientation bias one over the other. However,
I would still note here that the charges against Philip Lim were brought
under the Penal Code sections 377 and 377a, which are commonly referred
to as the sodomy or anti-homosexual laws. This shows how inadequate are
our laws, that we don't have any that are more specific to paedophilic
abuse. Instead, we keep in use these anti-homosexual laws, even if we
don't use them anymore for consensual homosex between adults. But, in so
doing, we confuse everybody about what is what.
© Yawning Bread
|
Straits Times
Tue, 11 March 2003
30 years' jail for
molesting stepdaughter over 2 years
By Elena Chong
A port worker stayed by his wife's side while she gave birth
to their first child, then went home and molested his
stepdaughter.
The 30-year-old man first told the 12-year-old girl's two
younger sisters to stop watching television and go to bed.
He then asked the victim to go to his bedroom where he
molested her and had anal intercourse with her.
This happened at the family's Bedok flat on Oct 27, 2001, the
night the man's natural daughter was born.
But the sexual abuse started even before he married the
victim's mother, a divorcee with three daughters, and continued
for almost two years.
Deputy Public Prosecutor Imran Abdul Hamid said that in early
January 2001, when the girl was 11, the man saw old scars on her
body caused by scabies, and called her into his bedroom on the
pretext of applying some medicated lotion to the scars.
After applying some lotion to her arms, he asked her to
remove her T-shirt and singlet so that he could apply some to
her torso.
He instead removed her lower garments and molested her,
stopping only when she gestured that it was painful.
His marriage to the girl's mother took place about two to
three weeks later.
There were several other instances of sexual abuse between
then and last September, involving molest, outrage of modesty,
forced oral sex and anal sex.
The truth came out when the girl was referred to the school
counsellor after missing school for two days last September. The
victim made a police report on Sept 30.
The man, who was arrested three days later, told the police
he had done it as he could not control his lust.
Pleading for leniency yesterday, he said he regretted what he
had done, and was prepared to face the consequences. He promised
not to repeat the offences, and urged the court to give him a
chance to redeem himself.
But Justice Woo Bih Li said that, as a stepfather, the man
was supposed to protect the victim. 'Instead, you sexually
abused her... and also caused her pain. What you have done is
despicable.'
He sentenced him to a total of 30 years and 23 strokes of the
cane on the 11 charges he admitted to. Another 13 charges were
taken into consideration.
|
|